Am 07.06.2012 um 17:59 schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]>:
> Le 6/6/12 6:39 AM, Garbage a écrit >> >> 1. Can M7 be considered stable enough for giving it a chance in a productive >> system? > No. I'm sad to say that but M7 still have a huge bug that we are tracking. > Not that you'll won't get a working server, but in some cases where > concurrent writes and searches are done, you are very likely to get some > failures during the searches. More than that, the database can get corrupted. > > We exactly know what is going wrong here, and we already have a fix, but this > is in a branch, and we are currenly merging this branch into trunk, which is > all but easy. > > M8 will solve this issue, and we expect to get it released ASAP. In the mean > time, you can use the directory/apacheds/branches/apacheds-txns branch whch > solve the issue. >> >> I only need ApacheDS to sit there and wait for incoming connections and >> forward them to my custom partition. There is no need for replication and >> all the other fancy stuff ApacheDS is able to do. > You can still work on the trunk, until M8 get released. > > Just keep tuned, we are doing our best to get back to some solid and reliable > server soon. > I believe I can use the released milestone 7 because parallel reads / writes don't exist in my scenario. Or are there any other issues I should keep an eye on ?
