Le 6/8/12 1:37 PM, Garbage a écrit :
Am 08.06.2012 um 08:55 schrieb Emmanuel Lécharny<[email protected]>:

Le 6/8/12 6:42 AM, Garbage a écrit :
 From what I know ApacheDS supports caching of search results, that means when 
I issue the same search after e.g. one minute the result will be returned from 
the cache.
First question: is this correct ?
No, searches are computed every time you send a request.
Is this something ApacheDS does on it's own or is this the job of the 
partitions involved ?
Second question: when implementing a custom partition would I need to take care 
of caching on my own ?
Atm, yes. We could have implemented a cache on top of partition, but it's not 
yet the case (such a cache will keep the entries assuming they have not been 
updated since their presence in the cache). This is certainly something we want 
to have alter, but atm we are working on stablizing the server itself...


--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Thanks, so I know that it makes sense to implement caching in the partition. 
Just wanted to make sure that I don't create (at least for now) unnecessary 
code.

This is not as simple.

There are a few things you might want to cache on a LDAP server, but definitively caching entries is a major saver. Now, that raises a few concerns : - how many entries will you cache ? (an entry can be quite large, for instance for those entries having a JpegPhot AttributeType) - how do you ensure the cache concurrency ? You may have many threads accessing to this cache, and it requires careful protection against concurrent modifications - At some point, caching an entry might be overkilling : as you will any way modify the returned entry, as you'll remove some of the Attrbutes or values, you will copy this cached entry anyway (there are other options, like not copying the entry, but generate the final result on the fly, having gathered the requested Attributes to return, but this can be very tricky to implement.

In any case, just try first to get your partiton working before implementing some cache :)


--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Reply via email to