Thanks for the fast response. I'm afraid I'm still a bit of a novice at using svn.
I was able to checkout the project pom, apacheds and daemon source with no problem. I did modify your commands slightly: svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/branches/1.0@647850 apacheds svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/daemon/branches/1.0@559605 daemon svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/branches/1.0-with-dependencies@647850 . I was not able to check out the shared source. I get the error: svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/branches/1.0@559606 shared svn: URL 'http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/branches/1.0' doesn't exist The reason I'm not going the LDIF route is: 1) We have ACI defined in our user data. I've not found a way to download that (yet). 2) This will happen during an update of the software and the apacheds server may not be runnable at this point. -----Original Message----- From: Emmanuel Lécharny [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2012 6:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Getting source for apacheds-1.0.3-SNAPSHOT Le 10/9/12 12:03 AM, Johnson, Wayne a écrit : > I'm trying to track down source for an old snapshot of ApacheDS so I > can do some debugging. Yea, it's old, stop laughing. We are using > apacheds-1.0.3-SNAPSHOT that was built on 8/9/2007. Stop laughing. > My hope was to check out the source from subversion. The web page > suggests the URL > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/branches/1.0-with-d > ependencies/ for that old branch but the URL no longer works and there > does not appear to be a 1.0-with-dependencies anymore. > > Anyone have any suggestions? Was that branch deleted? Any way to re-create > it? Hopefully, with Subversion, you can still find the sources :) The 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT trunk should be available at revision 647850 : svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/branches/1.0@647850 will pull the server, and you will also need shared-0.9.5 and daemon-1.0 : svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/daemon/branches/1.0@559605 svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/shared/branches/1.0@559606 Last, not least, you'll also need the 'project' project in version 7 : svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/project/tags/7 project and the root pom can be get with : svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/directory/apacheds/branches/1.0-with-dependencies@647850 . Not that you will get errors, as the externals have been removed, but that doe snot matter (also not the '.' at the end : it's andatory otherwise the check out will occur in a sub directory). I have some compilation failures when I run mvn clean install on the checked out code though. It may be due to the Java version I'm using (Java 6), as 1.0.3 was supposed to work with Java 1.4, and becaus ethere were some modifications in JNDI since then. > > We're in the process of migrating to DS 1.5.7 or 2.0.0 but we need some way > to get the data migrated over. I tried simply opening the JDBM files from > 1.0.3 but it appears that the Java package names ensconced in the data > serialization are not longer available under 1.5.7. My next hope was to > extract the data from the old 1.0.3 database with a serverless LDAP query > (i.e. calling the Java methods without going over a network). But to dig > into the code to find those methods will require the source. Thus the > request. Why don't you just extract the data as a big LDIF file ? Studio should be able to connect to Apacheds 1.0.3, and thne, you extract everything from the server, before reimporting everything into the new version. That should definitively work. > > Anyone have any pointers on migration data from 1.0.3 to 1.5.7 (or > better). I suggest you get the 2.0.0-M8 which should be available very soon (in fact, I'm just releasing it atm, it should be available by the end of the week). > Stop laughing... Frankly, I'm not laugning at all : the fact is you used a server that worked for 5 years before deciding to move on to a new version ! That's a pretty good news :) I'd like to listen about your usage... Thanks for using ADS ! -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
