thanks! On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:32 PM, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Marcos, > We’ve used the javax.imageio.ImageWriter to significantly reduce the size > of jpeg images. > > A 4.2MB image at 30% quality is 1/10 the size and the differences are only > slightly noticeable from the original. > > Here is how it the sizes differ between 10-100% quality. > > img-10.jpg 200194 > img-20.jpg 288217 > img-30.jpg 375060 > img-40.jpg 453826 > img-50.jpg 542917 > img-60.jpg 621533 > img-70.jpg 819533 > img-80.jpg 990477 > img-90.jpg 1686143 > img-100.jpg 4251385 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marcos Mendez [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 1:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: newbie question regarding master db + file size > > > > On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:46, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Marco, >> >> we have had long discussion about using an external storage (ie >> separate files) for things like pictures. It's not really easy, and >> I'm not sure it worth the effort. > > understood. thanks. > > >> All in all, there is no advantage in compressing a picture : it >> already uses a compressed format, the gain would be null. Using B64 >> encoding would be even worth, the file size would be 33% bigger... > > agreed. images already have that. again being a newbie i don't know how it is > actually stored. if its just the binary then it is fine. was more concerned > about the other (if any) encodings. > > >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Marcos Mendez <[email protected]> wrote: >>> i would also suggest compressing those resources if hex or base 64 encoding >>> is used to store them. you guys may do that already.... >>> >>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:08, Marcos Mendez <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> ok. thank you. >>>> >>>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:06 AM, Kiran Ayyagari wrote: >>>> >>>>> no, there is no such support in the server (we have discusses about >>>>> storing this kind of big blobs outside of the master db file but >>>>> was not implemented) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Marcos Mendez <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> We're having an issue with the size of the master database file, >>>>>> due to the fact that we're including pictures for people. We're >>>>>> using a version control mechanism that has a maximum of 50mb and we've >>>>>> already passed it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is there any way we can put those entries outside of that file but >>>>>> still be accessible as LDAP entries? We also don't want to have >>>>>> them stored at a separate location (eg. providing a file/url path, >>>>>> etc type solutions). The organization really wants them in the directory. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Marcos >>>>>> >>>>>> Installed version: apacheds-2.0.0-M14-64bit.bin >>>>>> OS: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Kiran Ayyagari >>>>> http://keydap.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Cordialement, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.iktek.com
