Please don't post message to me directly. Post them to the mailing list. yes, extending the gtoupOfNames ObjectClass is the standard best practice. Modifying it is really a wrong idea. You would lose the compatibility with all the LDAP servers out there, and any migration to a newer version of any server will require you to modify the standard schema.
And, no, you won't be in trouble with your client : just explain him that it's not an option. Ususally, clients are smarter than we think... On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Prasad Bodapati <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry, I have read that but I have missed your suggestion. > I am writing an API which sync data from ApacheDS to SOLR. > > So is that normal to extend the groupOfNames class ? If my client does not > do that I might be in trouble. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Emmanuel Lécharny [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 31 July 2014 12:32 > To: Prasad Bodapati > Subject: Re: Adding mail attribute to objectClass groupOfNames > > > Then what is the best way to add mail then ? > > Did you read my previous mail ? > > > ________________________________ > > -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
