On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Timothy Keith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Timothy Keith > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Timothy Keith > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>> Le 15/02/16 18:55, Timothy Keith a écrit : > >>>> I am attempting to do pass-through authentication from an OpenLDAP > >>>> server. I would to have debugging logs for all incoming requests. > >>>> > >>>> Tim > >>> What kind of log do you want exactly ? > >>> > >>> If you want to have some logs about every received message, you can > >>> modify the log4j.properties to set the > >>> org.apache.directory.server.ldap.handlers.request package to DEBUG. > >>> > >>> > >>> You'll receive logs like : > >>> > >>> LOG.debug( "Received: {}", bindRequest ); > >>> LOG.debug( "Handling request: {}", req ); > >>> LOG.debug( "Handling compare request while ignoring referrals: > >>> {}", req ); > >>> LOG.debug( "Handling request: {}", req ); > >>> LOG.debug( "Handling modify dn request while ignoring > referrals: > >>> {}", req ); > >>> LOG.debug( "Handling request : {}", req ); > >>> LOG.debug( "Handling single reply request: {}", req ); > >>> LOG.debug( "Received: {}", unbindRequest ); > >>> > >>> Four problems here : > >>> - not all the messages get logged (Abandon) > >>> - not all extended operations are logged, and they use a different > logger > >>> - overall, the messages are not consistent > >>> - you'll be flooded by logs you do'nt want. > >>> > >>> A better option would be to set a logger on > >>> org.apache.directory.api.ldap.codec.api.LdapDecoder. You will then get > >>> the fully decoded LDAP message like : > >>> > >>> LOG.debug( "Decoded LdapMessage : " + container ); > >>> > >>> > >> > >> It would first help me to know how to configure the location for the > >> wrapper.log on Microsoft Windows, and any other log files. In > >> wrapper.conf see a reference to "wrapper.log" file, but the single > >> occurrence of that file was only written to during the install of > >> Apache DS. > >> > >> Tim > > > > Sometimes the search logs stop showing any result of ldapsearch > > requests. This Apache Directory Studio 2.0.0 on a a Windows 7 > > system. > > > > Tim > > > Is it generally recommended to run Apache DS on Linux vs Windows? > > It works fine on both but if I have to pick a side it is Linux (obviously ;) On Linux you have the flexibility of running it using shell script without depending on the wrapper. > Tim > Kiran Ayyagari
