On 07/05/2019 13:51, Sergey Mikhno wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
Could you please give me some feedback on my questions.
1. Why do we have a ClassNotFounfException
DeepTrimCachingNormalizingComparator when starting our ApacheDS server
with AM25 Release jar.
(https://www-eu.apache.org/dist//directory/apacheds/dist/2.0.0.AM25/apacheds-2.0.0.AM25.zip)
This is a LDAP API 1.0 class, it has been removed in LDAP API 2.0, which
is used by apacheds 2.0.0-AM25.
That means you are using the old schema, which is stored on disk
(comparator are loaded using reflection, based on the content of the
schema files, which are stored in ldif files:
version: 1
dn: m-oid=1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.2.1,ou=comparators,cn=nis,ou=schema
m-oid: 1.3.6.1.4.1.4203.1.2.1
m-fqcn:
org.apache.directory.api.ldap.model.schema.comparators.DeepTrimCachingNormalizingComparator
objectclass: metaComparator
objectclass: metaTop
objectclass: top
creatorsname: uid=admin,ou=system)
You should remove everything you have in the cn=schema directory before
starting the server.
2. Is it important that we have one failing test
UberJarMainTest.repairTest, I did some debugging and found that server
sends INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_RIGHTS Response, that is why
NullPointerException occurs.
Best Regards
Sergey Mikhno
Software Developer
Galexis AG
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 3:08 PM Sergey Mikhno <sergey.mik...@gmail.com
<mailto:sergey.mik...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Emmanuel,
I wanted to inform you what are the results of our testing.
1. Starting the Release AM25 throws an Exception
(ClassNotFounfException DeepTrimCachingNormalizingComparator)
2. AM25-SNAPSHOT starts normally but we cannot use uniqueMember
index, because the query brings empty result.
3. M24 works OK with 2 changes - your commit
f995af78cca156071ab30f00a6615bd82911c4a1 and one more fix
(compareTo method from 2.0.0AM2), we can use uniqueMember index.
4. directory-server build has Test problems: Failed tests:
NullPointerException
UberJarMainTest.repairTest:208
UberJarMainTest.serviceInstanceTest:184
Could you please advice, what could be wrong?
Sergey Mikhno
Software Developer
Galexis AG
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 11:33 AM Sergey Mikhno
<sergey.mik...@gmail.com <mailto:sergey.mik...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear Emmanuel,
I spent now more than a week trying to understand why
uniqueMember index doesn't work and still have no progress in
understanding the problem.
With a defined index on uniqueMember my query brings empty result
*(**&*
*(*objectclass*=*groupOfUniqueNames*)*
*(**|*
*(*uniqueMember*=*cn=galexisLoginPOS*)*
*(*uniqueMember*=*cn=customerGalexis*)*
*(*uniqueMember*=*cn=customerAlloga*)*
*(*uniqueMember*=*cn=isDemo*)*
*)*
*)*
Without index the query brings correct results but is slow,
300ms.
Is there any description about how to define an index on
uniqueMember.
We have several other non-standard indexed attributes and all
of them are working.
As I understand it should be possible to define an index on
both member and uniqieMember.
So I have 2 questions:
1. Is it correct that this query is slow because there is no
index?
2. How should I define such an index?
Below is the current index definition
dn:
ads-indexAttributeId=uniqueMember,ou=indexes,ads-partitionId=system,ou=parti
tions,ads-directoryServiceId=default,ou=config
ads-indexHasReverse: FALSE
entryCSN: 20190430090357.476000Z#000000#001#000000
objectClass: ads-index
objectClass: top
objectClass: ads-jdbmIndex
objectClass: ads-base
createTimestamp: 20190430090357.476Z
creatorsName: 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=admin,2.5.4.11=system
ads-indexAttributeId: uniqueMember
ads-enabled: TRUE
entryUUID: dcd2fa31-5ee0-48fb-9d3e-30487957045a
entryParentId: fdf6f3a6-dfaf-4b1a-962c-faa14328d1ae
Could you please advice?
--
Sergey Mikhno
--
Sergey Mikhno
--
Sergey Mikhno
