? I see. But this should not be the issue in Ping. May be you could check the CPU per core and specifically the core where the KNI linux kernel thread runs.
?"Bowl of rice will raise a benefactor, a bucket of rice will raise a enemy.", Chinese proverb. FREYNET Marc Alcatel-Lucent France Centre de Villarceaux Route de Villejust 91620 NOZAY France Tel: +33 (0)1 6040 1960 Intranet: 2103 1960 marc.freynet at nokia.com From: EXT Masoud Moshref Javadi [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: lundi 25 janvier 2016 14:15 To: Freynet, Marc (Nokia - FR); users at dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] high jitter in dpdk kni I see. But this should not be the issue in Ping. By the way, I checked the timestamps of sending and receiving times at the kni sample application (kni_ingress and kni_egress methods). The RTT at that level is OK (0.1ms) and it seems the jitter comes from the kni kernel module. On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:29 AM Freynet, Marc (Nokia - FR) <marc.freynet at nokia.com<mailto:marc.freynet at nokia.com>> wrote: Hi, Some months ago we had a problem with the KNI driver. Our DPDK application forwards to the Linux kernel through KNI the SCTP PDU received from the Eth NIC. In one configuration, the SCTP port Source and Destination were constant on all SCTP connections. This is a known SCTP issue as in the multi processor environment, the SCTP stack uses the port Source and Destination to hash the processor that will run the SCTP context in the kernel. SCTP cannot use the IP address as a hash key thanks to the SCTP multi homing feature. As all SCTP PDU on all SCTP connections where processed by the same Core, this creates a bottle neck and the KNI interface starts creating Jitter and even was losing PDU when sending the SCTP PDU to the IP Linux kernel stack. I am wondering if in a previous release it you not be possible to add KNI a kind of load sharing with different queues on different cores to forward the received PDU to the IP Linux stack. ?"Bowl of rice will raise a benefactor, a bucket of rice will raise a enemy.", Chinese proverb. FREYNET Marc Alcatel-Lucent France Centre de Villarceaux Route de Villejust 91620 NOZAY France Tel: +33 (0)1 6040 1960 Intranet: 2103 1960 marc.freynet at nokia.com<mailto:marc.freynet at nokia.com> -----Original Message----- From: users [mailto:users-bounces at dpdk.org<mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of EXT Masoud Moshref Javadi Sent: samedi 23 janvier 2016 15:18 To: users at dpdk.org<mailto:users at dpdk.org> Subject: [dpdk-users] high jitter in dpdk kni I see jitter in KNI RTT. I have two servers. I run kni sample application on one, configure its IP and ping an external interface. sudo -E build/kni -c 0xaaaa -n 4 -- -p 0x1 -P --config="(0,3,5)" sudo ifconfig vEth0 192.168.1.2/24<http://192.168.1.2/24> ping 192.168.1.3 This is the ping result: 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2<http://192.168.1.2>: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=1.93 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2<http://192.168.1.2>: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.907 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2<http://192.168.1.2>: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=3.15 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2<http://192.168.1.2>: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1.96 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2<http://192.168.1.2>: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=3.95 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2<http://192.168.1.2>: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=2.90 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.1.2<http://192.168.1.2>: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=0.933 ms The ping delay between two servers without kni is 0.170ms. I'm using dpdk 2.2. Any thought on how to keep KNI delay predictable? Thanks
