https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/dpdk/latest/dpdk.pdf


this is the entire collection of documents - many pictures are missing - yes 
read online is fine

DPDK documentation - 
media.readthedocs.org<https://media.readthedocs.org/pdf/dpdk/latest/dpdk.pdf>
media.readthedocs.org
DPDK documentation, Release 17.02.0-rc0 1.2System Requirements This chapter 
describes the packages required to compile the DPDK. Note: If the DPDK is being 
used on an ...





________________________________
From: Xu, Qian Q <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 11:13 PM
To: Kaijun Zhan; Thomas Monjalon
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [dpdk-users] Missing Fig 1.1

What do you mean by whole pdf? I can see the figure online in html, can you see 
it online?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kaijun Zhan
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2017 2:57 PM
> To: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Missing Fig 1.1
>
> somehow if you read the whole pdf file then it is not there (and many of them
> missing)
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 1:31 PM
> To: Kaijun Zhan
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Missing Fig 1.1
>
> 2017-02-21 16:31, Kaijun Zhan:
> > on the "Getting Started with Linux" user guide, the Figure 1.1 "Performance
> Test Setup" is empty. I checked the latest version, it is also empty, no 
> diagram.
>
> It works on my browser:
> http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.html#example-
> of-getting-best-performance-for-an-intel-nic
> 7. How to get best performance with NICs on
> Intel ...<http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/linux_gsg/nic_perf_intel_platform.html#ex
> ample-of-getting-best-performance-for-an-intel-nic>
> dpdk.org
> 7. How to get best performance with NICs on Intel platforms. This document is 
> a
> step-by-step guide for getting high performance from DPDK applications on 
> Intel
> platforms.
>
>

Reply via email to