Thanks Keith. This is very helpful! On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Wiles, Keith <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mar 4, 2017, at 7:46 PM, Yuliang Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I am new to DPDK. I found 2 functions that can send packets: > > rte_eth_tx_buffer and rte_eth_tx_burst. I am confused about why we need > > these two different functions. To me, I can use only rte_eth_tx_burst, > and > > rte_eth_tx_buffer does add more functional capability. Are there any > other > > concerns like performance or others that we need these two functions? > > The best place to find out this type of information is to read the emails > around the rte_eth_tx_buffer APIs in the archives. You may want to refine > the search. > > https://mail-archive.com/search?a=1&l=dev%40dpdk.org&o= > newest&haswords=rte_eth_tx_buffer > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Yuliang Li > > PhD student > > Department of Computer Science > > Yale University > > Regards, > Keith > > -- Yuliang Li PhD student Department of Computer Science Yale University
