Thanks Shyam, great to see that people get the idea behind this design! Regards, Cristian
From: Shyam Shrivastav [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 5:14 PM To: Nidhia Varghese <[email protected]> Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian <[email protected]>; Singh, Jasvinder <[email protected]>; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Fwd: Sharing tables among pipelines Something I have gathered reading through code if it helps, ip_pipeline is designed such that user side cli (_fe) runs in master pipeline and sends conf requests to various other packet processing pipelines (_be) which handle such requests at intervals. These can run on same or different threads(cores) as per conf, no locking requirement as table-updation & table-reading (packet processing) always happens in same pipeline so always same thread. Master pipeline can be configured to run on a separate core & it should be the case, but table updation happens in pipeline thread only at lower priority. On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Nidhia Varghese <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi all, Thanks for your reply. As given in the link(3rd point), what I need is single writer thread(pipeline) performing table entry add/delete operations and another thread(which is in turn another pipeline) that performs lookup operations to the same table entries. Thanks, Nidhia Varghese
