Hi !
I performed many tests using Pktgen and it seems to work much better.
However, I observed that one of the tests showed that 2 packets were
dropped. In this test I sent packets between the 2 physical ports in
bidirectional mode during 24 hours. The packets size was 450 bytes and
the rate in both ports was 1500 Mbps.
The port stats I got are the following :
** Port 0 ** Tx: 34481474912. Rx: 34481474846. Dropped: 2
** Port 1 ** Tx: 34481474848. Rx: 34481474912. Dropped: 0
DEBUG portStats = {
[1] = {
["ipackets"] = 34481474912,
["ierrors"] = 0,
["rx_nombuf"] = 0,
["ibytes"] = 15378737810752,
["oerrors"] = 0,
["opackets"] = 34481474848,
["obytes"] = 15378737782208,
},
[0] = {
["ipackets"] = 34481474846,
["ierrors"] = 1,
["rx_nombuf"] = 0,
["ibytes"] = 15378737781316,
["oerrors"] = 0,
["opackets"] = 34481474912,
["obytes"] = 15378737810752,
},
["n"] = 2,
}
So 2 packets were dropped by port 0 and I see that "ierrors" counter has
a value of 1. Do you know what does this counter represent ? And what
could it be interpreted ?
By the way, I performed as well the same test changing the packet size
to 1518 bytes and the rate to 4500 Mbps (on each port) and 0 packets
were dropped.
David
Le 17.05.2017 09:53, [email protected] a écrit :
Thanks for your response !
I have installed Pktgen and I will perform some tests. So far it seems
to work fine. I'll keep you informed. Thanks again.
David
Le 12.05.2017 18:18, Wiles, Keith a écrit :
On May 12, 2017, at 10:45 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi !
I am working with MoonGen which is a fully scriptable packet
generator build on DPDK.
(→ https://github.com/emmericp/MoonGen)
The system on which I perform tests has the following characteristics
:
CPU : Intel Core i3-6100 (3.70 GHz, 2 cores, 2 threads/core)
NIC : X540-AT2 with 2x10Gbe ports
OS : Linux Ubuntu Server 16.04 (kernel 4.4)
I coded a MoonGen script which requests DPDK to transmit packets from
one physical port and to receive them at the second physical port.
The 2 physical ports are directly connected with an RJ-45 cat6 cable.
The issue is that I perform the same test with exactly the same
script and the same parameters several times and the results show a
random behavior. For most of the tests there is no losses but for
some of them I observe packet losses. The percentage of lost packets
is very variable. It happens even when the packet rate is very low.
Some examples of random failed tests :
# 1,000,000 packets sent (packets size = 124 bytes, rate = 76 Mbps) →
10170 lost packets
# 3,000,000 packets sent (packets size = 450 bytes, rate = 460 Mbps)
→ ALL packets lost
I tested the following system modifications without success :
# BIOS parameters :
Hyperthreading : enable (because the machine has only 2 cores)
Multi-processor : enable
Virtualization Technology (VTx) : disable
Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VTd) : disable
Allow PCIe/PCI SERR# Interrupt (=PCIe System Errors) : disable
NUMA unavailable
# use of isolcpus in order to isolate the cores which are in charge
of transmission and reception
# hugepages size = 1048576 kB
# size of buffer descriptors : tried with Tx = 512 descriptors and Rx
= 128 descriptors and also with Tx = 4096 descriptors and Rx = 4096
descriptors
# Tested with 2 different X540-T2 NICs units
# I tested all with a Dell FC430 which has a CPU Intel Xeon E5-2660
v3 @ 2.6GHz with 10 Cores and 2threads/Core (tested with and without
hyper-threading)
→ same results and even worse
Remark concerning the NIC stats :
I used the rte_eth_stats struct in order to get more information
about the losses and I observed that in some cases, when there is
packet losses, ierrors value is > 0 and also ierrors + imissed +
ipackets < opackets. In other cases I get ierrors = 0 and imissed +
ipackets = opackets which has more sense.
What could be the origin of that erroneous packets counting?
Do you have any explanation about that behaviour ?
Not knowing MoonGen at all other then a brief look at the source I may
not be much help, but I have a few ideas to help locate the problem.
Try using testpmd in tx-only mode or try Pktgen to see if you get the
same problem. I hope this would narrow down the problem to a specific
area. As we know DPDK works if correctly coded and testpmd/pktgen
work.
Thanks in advance.
David
Regards,
Keith
