> On Oct 20, 2018, at 9:32 AM, venkataprasad k <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 2nd Try.
> Any idea on this?
> Not clear what i am missing here.
Does the build work without sed command, if it does then something is wrong
with the sed command. In your case just edit the new config file and enable
PCAP PMD if this style will work for you needs.
Do not know if this will help at all. I some times copy the
config/deconfig_x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc to
config/deconfig_x86_64-mine-linuxapp-gcc then modify the new file to contain
the changes you want the config file. This way you do not have to be concerned
about how you do the make … config or as I do it this way.
cd dpdk
export RTE_SDK=`pwd`
export RTE_TARGET=x86_64-mine-linuxapp-gcc
make install T=$RTE_TARGET -j
You will get a warning at the end, but you can ignore it as you were not
installing the results anyway. Here is a bash script I use being lazy.
function _rte() {
if [ "$1" != "" ]; then
export RTE_SDK=`pwd`
export RTE_TARGET=`basename $1`
echo "RTE_SDK: "$RTE_SDK " RTE_TARGET: "$RTE_TARGET
else
echo "Currently RTE_SDK: "$RTE_SDK " RTE_TARGET: "$RTE_TARGET
fi
}
function _bld() {
echo make -C ${RTE_SDK} install T=${RTE_TARGET} $@ -j
make -C ${RTE_SDK} install T=${RTE_TARGET} $@ -j
}
function _dbld() {
echo make -C ${RTE_SDK} install T=${RTE_TARGET} EXTRA_CFLAGS="-g -O0" $@ -j
make -C ${RTE_SDK} install T=${RTE_TARGET} EXTRA_CFLAGS="-g -O0" $@ -j
}
alias rte=_rte $@
alias bld=_bld $@
alias dbld=_dbld $@
Then I just cd into the DPDK directory and type ‘rte
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc’ then I can just do ‘bld’ to build DPDK and it does
not matter which directory I am in when I do the build it will stay in the
directory I executed ‘bld’. The dbld command is to build DPDK with
EXTRA_CFLAGS=“-g -O0"
The rte command without args will print the current values and I normally cd to
DPDK directory and do ‘rte x8<tab>’ to complete the command.
Anyway I hope that helps.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Trahe, Fiona
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 5:40 PM
> To: Pathak, Pravin <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Cc: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: Crypto QAT device not found
>
> Hi Pravin,
>
> Good that it's working now.
> Be careful of the order on changing config, this works:
> 1. make T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc config 2. change build/.config (if you
> do make T=xx config after this it overwrites your changes and reverts to the
> default again) 3. make
>
> Fiona
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Pathak, Pravin
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 2:00 PM
>> To: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>> Subject: RE: Crypto QAT device not found
>>
>> Hi Fiona -
>>
>> Thanks for the help. I was using 18.05 and then moved to 18.08.
>> For configuration changes, there is build/.config, config/common_base
>> and x86_64-native-linuxapp-
>> gcc/.config.
>> I was changing build/.config and building but some reason it was not picking
>> the new options set.
>> Now I changed common_base, regenerated config and build again. It worked
>> after that.
>> I think I am not following correct build procedure.
>> There is make, make T= x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc, make install...
>> Each seems to work differently.
>>
>> I am able to use HW crypto device now.
>>
>> Regards
>> Pravin
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Trahe, Fiona
>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 4:25 PM
>> To: Pathak, Pravin <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>> Cc: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>
>> Subject: RE: Crypto QAT device not found
>>
>> Hi Pravin,
>>
>> As your VFs are bound to igb_uio this looks fine.
>> DPDK QAT PMD does support 37c9
>>
>> Can you confirm which DPDK version you're using? You mentioned 18.04 but
>> there's no such release.
>> If it's 18.08 then you also need CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_QAT_SYM=y but not in
>> earlier releases.
>>
>> Does the test code run for you?
>> run "make test-build" in the top-level directory
>> ./build/build/test/test/test -l1 -n1 -w <your bdf>
>>> cryptodev_qat_autotest
>>
>> Fiona
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Pathak, Pravin
>>> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2018 11:26 AM
>>> To: Trahe, Fiona <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>>> Subject: RE: Crypto QAT device not found
>>>
>>> Hi Fiona -
>>> Thanks for the reply. I tried -cdev_type HW but it did not help. I
>>> am not sure of DPDK supports the device on our board.
>>> Device is with ID 37c8/c9
>>>
>>> 3d:00.0 Co-processor: Intel Corporation Device 37c8 (rev 04)
>>> 3f:00.0 Co-processor: Intel Corporation Device 37c8 (rev 04)
>>> da:00.0 Co-processor: Intel Corporation Device 37c8 (rev 04)
>>> 3d:01.0 Co-processor: Intel Corporation Device 37c9 (rev 04)
>>> 3d:01.1 Co-processor: Intel Corporation Device 37c9 (rev 04)
>>> 3d:01.2 Co-processor: Intel Corporation Device 37c9 (rev 04)
>>> 3d:01.3 Co-processor: Intel Corporation Device 37c9 (rev 04) ........
>>>
>>> Everything looks correct except DPDK does not see these crypto
>>> devices. It seems virtual device if I add one.
>>> Is there any command like argument I need to pass or build option
>>> other than CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_QAT=y
>>>
>>> PFs are bound to Kernel and VFs are bound to DPDK.
>>>
>>> Crypto devices using kernel driver
>>> ==================================
>>> 0000:3d:00.0 'Device 37c8' if= drv=c6xx unused=qat_c62x,igb_uio
>>> 0000:3f:00.0 'Device 37c8' if= drv=c6xx unused=qat_c62x,igb_uio
>>> 0000:da:00.0 'Device 37c8' if= drv=c6xx unused=qat_c62x,igb_uio
>>>
>>> Crypto devices using DPDK-compatible driver
>>> ===========================================
>>> 0000:3d:01.0 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf
>>> 0000:3d:01.1 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf
>>> 0000:3d:01.2 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf
>>> 0000:3d:01.3 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf
>>> 0000:3d:01.4 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf
>>>
>>> # Drivers loaded
>>>
>>> pkpathak@paamrpdk03:~/acp/snr/install$ lsmod | grep qat
>>> qat_c62xvf 16384 0
>>> qat_c62x 20480 0
>>> intel_qat 163840 3 qat_c62x,qat_c62xvf,usdm_drv
>>> uio 20480 2 igb_uio,intel_qat
>>> authenc 16384 1 intel_qat
>>>
>>> Anything you can spot incorrect or missing?
>>> Regards
>>> Pravin
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Trahe, Fiona
>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 8:05 PM
>>> To: Pathak, Pravin <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>>> Subject: RE: Crypto QAT device not found
>>>
>>> Hi Pravin,
>>> See below.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: users [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pathak,
>>>> Pravin
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2018 2:30 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: [dpdk-users] Crypto QAT device not found
>>>>
>>>> Hi All -
>>>> I have server with Intel QAT c62x device. I followed all documentation.
>>>>
>>>> - Rebuild DPDK to use QAT
>>>>
>>>> - QAT drivers are loaded.
>>>>
>>>> - QAT devices are bound to DPDK
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Crypto devices using DPDK-compatible driver
>>>> ===========================================
>>>> 0000:3d:01.0 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:01.1 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:01.2 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:01.3 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:01.4 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:01.5 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:01.6 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:01.7 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:02.0 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:02.1 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>> 0000:3d:02.2 'Device 37c9' drv=igb_uio unused=qat_c62xvf,vfio-pci
>>>>
>>>> But if I use l2fwd-crypto sample, I get no crypto device found
>>>> error
>>>>
>>>> Checking link statusdone
>>>> Port0 Link Up. Speed 1000 Mbps - full-duplex
>>>> Port1 Link Up. Speed 1000 Mbps - full-duplex Lcore 0: RX port 0
>>>> Lcore
>>>> 1: RX port 1 No crypto devices available
>>>> EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1
>>>> Cause: Failed to initialize crypto devices
>>>>
>>>> It works if I add virtual device --vdev "crypto_aesni_mb0" but I am not
>>>> able to use HW device.
>>>> Your help is appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Pravin
>>> [Fiona] I haven't used this tool for a while, but the command line
>>> options should be similar to the dpdk- test-crypto-perf tool. For
>>> that for QAT you should whitelist the
>> device. e.g.:
>>> -w 0000:3d:01.0 ( before the -- , i.e. it's an EAL parameter) and
>>> use --devtype crypto_qat (after the -- , it's a parameter for the
>>> application).
>>> The terminology of --vdev changed in a recent release, so refer to
>>> the version of
>>> http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/sample_app_ug/l2_forward_crypto.html
>>> for the cmdline options appropriate to the release you're using.
>>> -cdev_type HW should also cause it to select QAT
>
>
> Thanks,
> Venkat
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:09 PM venkataprasad k <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Getting the following error while compiling dpdk.
>> Not clear what i am missing.
>>
>> $ make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
>> Configuration done using x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
>> $ sed -ri 's,(PMD_PCAP=).*,\1y,' build/.config
>> $ make
>> == Build lib
>> *dpdk-stable-18.02.2/mk/rte.subdir.mk:56 <http://rte.subdir.mk:56>: ***
>> missing separator. Stop.*
>> *make[1]: *** [lib] Error 2*
>> *make: *** [all] Error 2*
>> $ uname -a
>> Linux sce-bld-lin2 2.6.32-754.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu May 24 18:18:25 EDT
>> 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Venkat
>>
Regards,
Keith
