On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 09:07:02 +0100 Vincenzo Maffione <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you don't care about CPU utilization, busy-wait is the way to go. > Otherwise you can try to usleep() for something like 60-70 us (to lower the > CPU utilization), and then busy-wait for the rest of the interval (so that > you still have maximum precision). > > You may want to have a look at this > https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article/61/6/808/4259797 , specially > sections 4.3 and 4.1. > > Cheers, > Vincenzo > > Il giorno dom 28 ott 2018 alle ore 09:01 Sungho Hong < > [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > Thank you very much for the reply. > > But in that case, should I busy wait, to create the delay? > > > > > > > If doing very brief and exact sleep, you should change your thread priority to one of the Real Time classes.
