Hi,all:
     We are facing a problem with vmxnet3 poor performance issue.
    
     Our envrionment is below:     Esxi 6.5 and 6.7, using vmxnet3 nic, we are 
use a l2fwd vm to trunk all the packet, and do the packets retransmit     There 
are 3 vm in my env,  1 tx-vm , 1 rx-vm  and 1 l2fwd-vm
     1) Tx vm using vlan 4 in portgroup1, send packets;     2) Rx vm using vlan 
5 in portgroup2, receivce packets;
     3) Our L2fwd vm using vlan trunk in portgroup3, and change the vlan-4 to 
vlan-5 so that rx-vm can receive the packets.     4) Use dpdk 18.05 , 18.11 and 
19.02 
     Here is my l2fwd code changes when forward the packets :             
struct ether_hdr *eth;        void *tmp;      eth = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(m, struct 
ether_hdr *);  uint16_t ether_type = eth->ether_type;  uint16_t hdr_len = 
sizeof(struct ether_hdr);    if (ether_type == 
rte_cpu_to_be_16(ETHER_TYPE_VLAN)) {          struct vlan_hdr * vh = 
rte_pktmbuf_mtod_offset(m, struct vlan_hdr *, hdr_len);          vh->vlan_tci = 
0x0500;                       // change the vlan tag to vlan 5   }     
    And we see l2fwd dropped many packets when tx-vm transimit about 5G 
(1518bytes) packets, about 420000 pps , and only receive about 350000 pps.    
[root@vrouter1 home]# ./l2fwd -c 6 -n 4 --socket-mem  1000,0 -- -p 1 -T1
Port statistics ====================================Statistics for port 0 
------------------------------Packets sent:                  8836653Packets 
received:             10000022Packets dropped:               1163369Aggregate 
statistics ===============================Total packets sent:            
8836653Total packets received:       10000022Total packets dropped:         
1163369====================================================       I know the 
dropped stats means the vmxnet3 tx ring exhausted , but when  tx-vm and rx-vm 
in same vlan , there is no drop packets. Or with diffrent vlan , the kernel 
driver is better than dpdk. 

    Could somebody give some suggestion ? Thanks in advance !!


--------------------------------


Regards  
Shawn Zheng

Reply via email to