Hi, On 07/19, Hideyuki Yamashita wrote: >Hello, > >I am trying to use rte_flow with i40e PMD. > >What I want to achieve is like following. > > ---(dst MAC=XorY && VID=AorB) ---> PHY --default(VID=B)--> Queue0 > VID=A && > dstMAC=X----> Queue1 > VID=A && > dstMAC=Y----> Queue2 > >I tried to create flow using testpmd, but failed. > >testpmd> flow create 0 ingress pattern eth dst is 11:22:33:44:55:66 type mask >0xffff / vlan tci is 150 / end quactions inqueue index 1 / end >Caught error type 13 (specific pattern item): cause: 0x17ff5e200, Invalid >MAC_addr mask.3, : Invalid argument >testpmd>
It failed due to the flow used in your example would use i40e fdir filter, and currently it doesn't support dst MAC. > >Note that I could create flow which matches with dst Mac address. >I could also create flow which matches with VID. If you create flow with dst MAC address only, then it's handled by ethertype filter which supports dst MAC. Thanks, Xiaolong > >---(dst MAC=XorYorZ) ---> PHY --default(Z)--> Queue0 > dstMAC=X----> Queue1 > dstMAC=Y----> Queue2 > >---(VID=AorB) ---> PHY --default(B)--> Queue0 > VID=A-------> Queue1 > >However when comined those two into one flow, testpmd failed to validate the >flow. > > >Q1. Why above flow can not be created? >Q2. All the NICs supported by i40e-PMD do NOT provide above operation and >packet classification features? >Q3. Are there any PMD/NIC which allow above operation? > > >Thaks in advance, > >Hideyuki Yamashita >NTT TechnoCross > >
