Hi Yongseok,

Thanks for replying. I will have a try.

Thanks,
Daniel Benli Ye


> On Aug 3, 2019, at 5:53 AM, Yongseok Koh <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Can you try the following patch, which had been added after 18.11.0
> I'll try to push it for 18.11.3.
> 
> http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=ce9494d76c478345679abbda2a5606646de9886f
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Yongseok
> 
>> On Jul 28, 2019, at 2:12 AM, benli ye <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Mellanox experts,
>> 
>> I am running DPDK 18.11.0 performance test with mlx5 PMD driver on device 
>> ConnectX®-4 Lx EN. Our own DPDK app (a Load Balance app) is used and UDP 64 
>> bytes is generated by tester.
>> We found that when we generated about 2.6Mpps UDP traffic for 1 core and 2 
>> port setting testbed, our app starts to drops packets. However, the strange 
>> issue is we cannot see any imissed or error statistics from DPDK layer.
>> I saw the Mellanox test performance result in 
>> https://fast.dpdk.org/doc/perf/DPDK_18_11_Mellanox_NIC_performance_report.pdf
>>  and how do you find packet lose? Is there a bug in statistic calculation in 
>> DPDK or there is another way to trace packet drop?
>> Retrieve DPDK statistics is also used for Intel NIC and the behavior is 
>> right. it should not be wrong for our usage in our own app.
>> 
>> Any suggestions would be welcomed. Thanks very much!
>> 
>> 
>> Bests,
>> Daniel Benli Ye
> 

Reply via email to