On 1/26/2014 12:35, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:22:09AM +0100, John Marino wrote: >> On 1/26/2014 00:16, [email protected] wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure if you meant that only pam_krb5 failed to configure when >>> Heimdal was the default, or if dports itself was failing. In my case, >>> pam_krb5 is now 100% functionnal. >> >> If it failed to configure in a clean jail but builds outside of jail, >> that means there's an unlisted dependency for the port that you happened >> to have installed, somehow. So it works by chance, and not guaranteed >> to be repeatable. > > The port is missing a LIB_DEPENDS line: > > .if defined(KRB5_IMPL) && ${KRB5_IMPL} == heimdal > +LIB_DEPENDS+= krb5:${PORTSDIR}/security/heimdal > > Is it worth it to file a FreeBSD PR ?
No, this port requires a makefile diff anyway. The reason security/heimdal isn't needed on FreeBSD is because it's in the base. So I'll add the line, but does that mean we should change the default to heimdal? I tend to think so, if for no other reason to match what FreeBSD does to minimize surprises. John
