*why not share more information, for example write a internal document for developers like NetBSD in order to help newcomers.*
*https://www.netbsd.org/docs/internals/en/index.html <https://www.netbsd.org/docs/internals/en/index.html>* On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Sepherosa Ziehau <sepher...@gmail.com> wrote: > For static rules, ipfw2 in the base is already lockless MPSAFE. I > want to change the states lockless MPSAFE (it was not doable back to > the time I made ipfw2 static rules lockless MPSAFE; but now since we > dispatch udp outputs to the proper netisr, it is doable). > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Zachary Crownover > <zachary.crowno...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I would say follow in the steps that were taken for the pf code that was > > touched recently for SMP support and prevention of locking for you > > application of the same into ipfw. > > > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:04 PM, bycn82 <byc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi , > >> I am re-writing the ipfw for dragonflybsd. and once I cleanup the code, > I > >> will continue port some useful features like NAT and policy routing.( > NAT > >> will be the next one) > >> > >> And here is a simple wiki page for it, > >> http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/ipfw2/ > >> > >> any comment? Sure I need people's help in testing of it. thanks in > >> advanced. > >> > >> Regards, > >> bycn82 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely, > > > > Zachary Crownover > > > > -- > Tomorrow Will Never Die >