Short answer: yes, set up swapcache on the SSD and you'll benefit. That's the goal of swapcache. See the swapcache man page for a guide on how large to make your partition, and use the rest for / or however you want to arrange it.
For the heck of it, instead of swapcache, you could create them as two Hammer volumes - the SSD as the master, the USB disk as the slave - and mirror the master to the slave. The mirroring process will not slow the disk writes, but that will limit you to the size of the SSD. You'd be able to put a generous history policy on the USB disk and save a good amount of file history in the extra space. That may not be what you want. On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 6:05 PM, PeerCorps Trust Fund <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear All! > > I have set up a gigabit LAN and have been testing the use of a laptop as a > file server/NAS over NFS. The server in question has a 2 terabyte external > hard disk attached via USB 2.0. The laptop itself has a 120 gigabyte SSD > installed as its main drive. My question is whether there might be a way to > use Dragonfly's swapcache on the SSD in order to get the maximum speed out of > the network to transfer files to the laptop's SSD while it writes to the > external drive simultaneously in the background? Is there a way to for > example increase the size of the swapcache to say 50 gigabytes and route the > writes to it (and possibly other disks mounted elsewhere)? > > I've tested writes directly over the LAN to the SSD and it tops out at around > 120 megabytes per second...which is phenomenal. However when writing to the > disk I get speeds of around 18-22 megabytes per second. Not horrible, but > quite a substantial difference. > > Any tips would be extremely appreciated. > > M
