Hi Matthias, Yes they can work together.
Regards, Bill Yuan On Sunday, 3 January 2016, Matthias Play <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Bill, > > thanks for your quick answer! > > An NFS daemon is running on my server machine which I use to mount DFly > source and obj dirs on my client machines. With NFS comes mountd and rpc* > daemons that automatically also provide their service on IPv6 ports. I did > not find daemon flags to tell them only to use IPv4 so I would like to > block unwanted traffic to these ports. > > Would it be ok to also run ip6fw alongside with ipfw3? > > If yes, I will set up a configuration file for ip6fw allowing all IPv4 > traffic and blocking all IPv6 traffic. > > Regards > Matthias > > On 03.01.16 14:09, bycn82 wrote: > >> Hi Happy New Year Matthias, >> not support IPv6 yet >> but yes i want to integrate with ip6fw as well. >> recently working on something related to voip. so did not find much time >> for BSD. >> Will support v6 once I remove the lock in NAT. >> >> Regards, >> Bill Yuan >> On Sunday, 3 January 2016, Matthias Play <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Happy New Year and all the Best in 2016! >> >> I set up ipfw3 to filter network traffic on a local server and want >> to filter all IPv6 traffic since I do not need it in my local network. >> >> Is ipfw3 also filtering IPv6 traffic or only IPv4? >> >> I am wondering because with the old ipfw implementation handling of >> both IP versions is separated into two different firewall programs, >> ipfw and ip6fw both being configured using distinct rc.conf variables. >> >> If IPv6 filtering is not supported by ipfw3 would it be better to >> configure a custom kernel without the INET6 option instead of using >> ip6fw alongside with ipfw3? >> >> Best Regards >> Matthias >> >>
