Hi, everyone!

I'm porting ChezScheme that was recently opensourced to DragonFly.

I was able to compile it, but lots of tests are failing. At least some of them are due to (minor) bugs in DragonFly (http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issues/2951).

Also I noticed that one of the tests is failing because function pow(3) returns a different (wrong?) value compared to pow on other platforms.

On DragonFly:
a@kl:~/tmp$ uname -a
DragonFly kl.zta.lk 4.6-RELEASE DragonFly v4.6.0.10.g16fba-RELEASE #10: Wed Aug 17 14:26:31 CEST 2016 r...@kl.zta.lk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/X86_64_GENERIC x86_64
a@kl:~/tmp$ cat powtest.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>

void printrep(double x)
  unsigned long r = *(unsigned long *)&x;
  for (int i = 0; i != 64; ++i)
    putchar((r & (1lu << (63 - i))) ? '1' : '0');

int main()
  double x, y;
  scanf("%lf%lf", &x, &y);
  printrep(pow(x, y));
  return 0;
a@kl:~/tmp$ cc powtest.c -lm
a@kl:~/tmp$ echo 10.0 -20.0 | ./a.out

On Mac OSX the same program:
a@zdev:~/tmp$ uname -a
Darwin zdev.local 15.6.0 Darwin Kernel Version 15.6.0: Mon Aug 29 20:21:34 PDT 2016; root:xnu-3248.60.11~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64
a@zdev:~/tmp$ cc powtest.c
a@zdev:~/tmp$ echo 10.0 -20.0 | ./a.out

I am not an expert in floating point arithmetic, more importantly not an expert in IEEE754. Maybe this is not a bug. Looks like a different rounding, but I'm not sure if it is allowed by IEE754. Does anyone know if it's OK? I can simply use powl instead of pow, this will make the test pass, but I would like not to create a workaround if this is really a bug.

Aleksej Lebedev

Reply via email to