On 10/20/17 14:43, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
Michael Neumann <[email protected]> wrote:
No. HAMMER1 mirroring works on the logical level, the physical drive
size is not important. You can think of it as if you would replay the
SQL statements in a database vs block level replication. With HAMMER1
mirroring you end up with two physically distinct filesystems with
identical content (where it matters).
mirror-stream is damn cool. I once did a live presentation of it at my
university, where I were replicating a PFS of my box from the data
center via WiFi to this tiny little Asus EEEpc. Students could upload
to my remote box and the name would pop up on my laptop via OSD once
the file was replicated to my laptop. It became funny as people started
to chat with me via OSD during my presentation by constructing file
names and uploading them ;).
Regards,
Michael
One would think that a person with as many years of schooling as I have
knows at least how to use Internet search engine. These slides from your
HAMMER talk
https://www.ntecs.de/talks/HAMMER.pdf
are pure gem. Thank you so much for your e-mail and clarifications
You found it! :). You are welcome!
To clarify slide 4: You can either start "hammer mirror-stream" from the
masterhost OR from the slavehost. You don't need both.
Regards,
Michael
