Hello Michael, thank you for your response.
> Do both systems run recent versions of DragonFly? We had a change back > in 2010 [1] that would fail between two 64-bit machines. But I strongly > doubt this is the reason. Well then maybe your network is unreliable? They’re both on 5-RELEASE, in different detail stages. (The exact stages where in my first e-mail). > Another thing you could test is to do a fresh mirror-copy, i.e. > > hammer mirror-copy /pfs/hg remotemachine@/pfs/new-hg This didn’t work so well: | zoii# hammer mirror-copy /pfs/hg [email protected]:/pfs/hg-new | PFS slave /pfs/hg-new does not exist. | Do you want to create a new slave PFS? [y/n] No terminal for response | hammer: Aborting operation | hammer: validate_mrec_header: short read Also, I’m rather confident it’s not our network. All other traffic there works just fine. I’m somewhat sceptical of the receiving end being able to do md5 checksums — there was an issue on updating packages that also threw out a lot of checksum issues with files. Konrad
