On 13 Dec 2013, at 21:47, Frank Loeffler <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 09:33:39PM -0600, Frank Loeffler wrote: >> Current status of the development version: all tests except those in ADM >> (deprecated) and one Carpet testsuite pass. > > ADM is now retired, which leaves two Carpet testsuites failing: > CarpetInterp/test/waveinterp-?p.par.
The ticket for this failure is https://trac.einsteintoolkit.org/ticket/1497. > From what I can see this is not (necessarily) a failure of CarpetInterp, > but of Carpet itself. This testsuite uses the three-level > initialization, coupled to a few refinement levels. This scheme seems to > have problems in that case. We have other testsuites using it, but not > with mesh refinement. Using only unigrid with the failing testsuite > seems to work (doesn't produce nans and non-sensical time values like > when using mesh refinement). > > Without a deep analysis it looks like that either the three-level > initialization in Carpet is broken when using mesh refinement, or there > is some error in the parameter file that both I and Carpet didn't catch. > > Before spending time by looking into a possible fix in Carpet: is anyone > actually using or interested in this feature? If not, we might as well > use the time elsewhere and disable/remove it. I would like this to work. > > Frank > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users -- Ian Hinder http://numrel.aei.mpg.de/people/hinder
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
