Hello Hee Il, > Even though it may not be popularly used, Wv-reconstruction for > PPM+Polytropic EoS doesn't seem to work properly. It gives significantly > different result compared to the one with velocity reconstruction. I have > seen at least the followings are fine; > > 2nd order ENO + Poly EoS (cf. crashed with 3rd order ENO) > PPM + Ideal Fluid EoS > 5th order WENO + Ideal Fluid EoS (cf. No poly EoS supports in WENO) > > The tests have been done with Herschel and partly with Noether. Just to be very sure: you see these issues only when using polytropic EOS, ie Ideal_Fluid EOS is fine? I am asking because for some of the routines there are two copies, a Ideal_Fluid one and a 2D_Polytrope one and only the later would contain the possible bug if you only see it for polytropes. Note that reconstruct_Wv does (by design) give different answers than the direct velocity reconstruction, in particular when the velocities are high. Are the "different" numbers you see "obviously wrong"?
Yours, Roland -- My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
