On Jan 20, 2015, at 14:23 , Ian Hinder <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 20 Jan 2015, at 20:14, Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Jan 20, 2015, at 14:06 , Roland Haas <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>>> We recently put some work into making the ASCII output from the tests >>>> the same independent of the number of processes that they are run on. >>>> This used the fact that the output ordering of components from Carpet >>>> was the same under certain conditions. This was using the old >>>> bboxset class. Do you know if the new bboxset class has the same >>>> property? >>> If we regenerate for the new code but have some machines where it does >>> not run, this will imply that the tests will fail on those machines, yes. >> >> I updated the old bboxset class to explicitly sort the bboxes. Both are now >> using the same ordering. > > Do you know why only one test showed a difference?
I assume this is by chance. More complex grid structures are likely to change, and this was an AMR (with actual A) test. -erik -- Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/ My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from https://sks-keyservers.net.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
