Hello all, > Indeed. If you (still) have access to Mathematica. I just don't see > the point of deliberately breaking backward compatibility, even in > the case where the old behaviour was not in agreement with the > documentation. What is the benefit of doing this? I would have very much liked to be able to make this behaviour an error, however I think for the flesh, we will need to support this behaviour for quite a while even after we fix Kranc. Note that this particular issue can easily be fixed by users by modifying the Kranc generated files even when one does not have access to Mathematica anymore (or not at all) so that the cost of breaking things is low (since we are not actually removing functionality).
I would certainly think that we want the warning (and lots of them) as well if we hope that this will ever go away, since otherwise the thorns never get fixed, as evidenced by the fact that the Kranc ticket still exists. Only not having this in the documentation is not enough it seems since the possibility of using quotes was never documented (and only works for doubles, not for integers) and yet was used. Yours, Roland -- My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net. -- My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
