Well, let's start small then. I suggested Carpet since it is smaller than Cactus, or all of the ET. But maybe we should start out even smaller -- maybe with one of the CactusUtils thorns. Let's pick Formaline; this one has a formatting that's different from almost all other thorns anyway, and it doesn't see much development.
-erik On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Roland Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > > Anyway -- we should easily be able to all use the same version of > > clang-format. > Easily: Weeellll maybe. > > On my workstation using Debian (testing) the only version that I can > easily use are: 3.4 and 3.5 . On my OSX laptop Homebrew installs a > version that identifies as 3.7 (no other version provided it seems, at > least brew search clang-format only finds the one formula). One should > be able to compile clang-format from scratch, I have never done so though. > > I'd normally suggest to try this (now since it is at the beginning of a > release lifetime) and see how well we fare. However I don't know how one > would "undo" the use of automatic formatting of the repository during > the testing stage if we end up not liking the results. > > Yours, > Roland > > > -- > My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting > and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://keys.gnupg.net. > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
