Hi Erik,

We evolve alpha and beta for the gauge variables as given in equations 7a and 7b of http://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.06153.pdf. The number I reported for LazEv was using 5th order dissipation applied to all 21 evolved variables (alp, beta^i, At_{ij}, gt_{ij}, Gammat^{i}, trK, and xi).

LazEv is calculating the Hamiltonian and Momentum constraints as well as the constraints on Gammat^i using 4th order stencils.

I also forgot to mention that I did these tests on 16 nodes, and the memory usage was relatively low ( ~2 GB/MPI process ).

I will give the internal dissipation for McLachlan a try.

Thanks,
Jim

On 07/27/2015 05:56 PM, Erik Schnetter wrote:
Jim

Thanks for posting the details.

Can you give us more details about the LazEv scheme? In particular there may be differences in the gauge. What (gauge) variables do you evolve? What gauge conditions do you use? And what kind of dissipation do you apply? Can you point us to the source code?

For the new McLachlan, you would probably use the built-in dissipation instead of thorn Dissipation, which should lead to a small speed-up.

-erik

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:43 PM, James Healy <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hello,

    I have been running some tests on Stampede comparing the run speed
    of McLachlan to RIT's evolution thorn LazEv.  I started with the
    qc0-mclachlan.par parameter file included with the Einstein
    Toolkit, added a few refinement levels, increased the resolution
    and changed McLachlan to be 8th order (and increased the number of
    ghost zones to 5).  I also increased the initial separation so the
    finest grids aren't already overlapping.  To compare with LazEv, I
    removed the McLachlan and Dissipation thorns and replaced them
    with LazEv. Everything else in the parameter file is exactly the
    same.  I tried using both the McLachlan master and rewrite branches.

    The grid setup is 10 levels of refinement, dx=4M on the coarsest
    with outer boundary at 400M, M/128 on the finest with r=0.6M, CFL
    is 0.25.  Both use 8th order spatial differencing with
    ghost_size=5 and 5th order dissipation.

    Below is a summary of the results as reported at iteration 256
    from Carpet::physical_time_per_hour:

    McLachlan - rewrite branch: 3.0596110 M/hr
    McLachlan - master branch: 3.8033607 M/hr
    LazEv - 4.1941544 M/hr

    I am using the stampede-impi.cfg configuration file in simfactory.
    "module list" returns:

      1) TACC-paths   3) cluster-paths      5) xalt/0.4.6   7) TACC
      2) Linux        4) intel/13.0.2.146 <http://13.0.2.146>  6)
    cluster      8) impi/4.1.0.030 <http://4.1.0.030>

    Attached is my parameter file.  I pasted the McLachlan parameters
    below.  Are there any optimizations that I can use for McLachlan?
    Are the parameters I am using for it what would be used for
    production runs?

    ML_BSSN::harmonicN           = 1      # 1+log
    ML_BSSN::harmonicF           = 2.0    # 1+log
    ML_BSSN::ShiftGammaCoeff     = 0.75
    ML_BSSN::BetaDriver          = 1.0
    ML_BSSN::LapseAdvectionCoeff = 1.0
    ML_BSSN::ShiftAdvectionCoeff = 1.0

    ML_BSSN::MinimumLapse        = 1.0e-8

    ML_BSSN::my_initial_boundary_condition = "extrapolate-gammas"
    ML_BSSN::my_rhs_boundary_condition     = "NewRad"
    Boundary::radpower                     = 2

    ML_BSSN::ML_log_confac_bound = "none"
    ML_BSSN::ML_metric_bound     = "none"
    ML_BSSN::ML_Gamma_bound      = "none"
    ML_BSSN::ML_trace_curv_bound = "none"
    ML_BSSN::ML_curv_bound       = "none"
    ML_BSSN::ML_lapse_bound      = "none"
    ML_BSSN::ML_dtlapse_bound    = "none"
    ML_BSSN::ML_shift_bound      = "none"
    ML_BSSN::ML_dtshift_bound    = "none"

    ML_BSSN::fdOrder = 8

    ActiveThorns = "Dissipation"

    Dissipation::order = 5
    Dissipation::vars  = "
            ML_BSSN::ML_metric
            ML_BSSN::ML_trace_curv
            ML_BSSN::ML_curv
            ML_BSSN::ML_Gamma
            ML_BSSN::ML_lapse
            ML_BSSN::ML_shift
            ML_BSSN::ML_dtlapse
            ML_BSSN::ML_dtshift
    "

    ActiveThorns = "ML_ADMConstraints"


    Thanks,
    Jim Healy

    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users




--
Erik Schnetter <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to