On 13 Oct 2015, at 19:20, Barry Wardell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Ian Hinder <[email protected]> wrote: > I just realised that AEILocalInterp was moved to > > https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/numerical > > Would it be better for this to be under the cactuscode team instead, i.e. > > https://bitbucket.org/cactuscode/numerical > > AEILocalInterp is nothing to do with the Einstein equations. > > I believe the reasoning for including it in the Numerical arrangement as > opposed to, for example, CactusNumerical is that AEILocalInterp is licensed > under the GPL and the author does not wish to relicense it under the LGPL. > Since Cactus thorns are required to be licensed under the LGPL it cannot be > include with Cactus, and so the idea was to have it as part of a new > arrangement under the Einstein Toolkit instead. Hi Barry, Yes, we didn't want to (couldn't) make it part of Cactus, i.e. in an arrangement starting with "Cactus". But I thought we were going to still host it under the Cactus BitBucket account, since being under Einstein Toolkit doesn't make much sense. It is of interest to a wider community than just those using Cactus for GR. The idea was to have a generic location for free software Cactus thorns which are not part of Cactus. -- Ian Hinder http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
