On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Erik Schnetter <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Ian Hinder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On 13 Oct 2015, at 19:20, Barry Wardell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Ian Hinder <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I just realised that AEILocalInterp was moved to >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/numerical >>> >>> Would it be better for this to be under the cactuscode team instead, i.e. >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/cactuscode/numerical >>> >>> AEILocalInterp is nothing to do with the Einstein equations. >>> >> >> I believe the reasoning for including it in the Numerical arrangement as >> opposed to, for example, CactusNumerical is that AEILocalInterp is licensed >> under the GPL and the author does not wish to relicense it under the LGPL. >> Since Cactus thorns are required to be licensed under the LGPL it cannot be >> include with Cactus, and so the idea was to have it as part of a new >> arrangement under the Einstein Toolkit instead. >> >> >> Hi Barry, >> >> Yes, we didn't want to (couldn't) make it part of Cactus, i.e. in an >> arrangement starting with "Cactus". But I thought we were going to still >> host it under the Cactus BitBucket account, since being under Einstein >> Toolkit doesn't make much sense. It is of interest to a wider community >> than just those using Cactus for GR. The idea was to have a generic >> location for free software Cactus thorns which are not part of Cactus. >> > > Historically -- and way before the Einstein Toolkit existed -- the > cactuscode.org CVS (and later SVN) servers hosted many Cactus-related > repositories for non-Cactus thorns. > I have moved the arrangement to the Cactus BitBucket account, as suggested. Barry
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
