On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Frank Loeffler <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:53:46PM +0200, Ian Hinder wrote: > > > Note that this technically means proposing it for the ET, and making > sure that the usual requirements are met. > > > > Actually, no, it doesn't. Moving it to CactusNumerical means adding it > to Cactus, not to the ET. We would not add it to the ET thornlist. > > It doesn't mean proposing it for the ET, but I imagine we should have > similar ideals for Cactus as well, if not the same. Moving a thorn into > a Cactus arrangement means that we "officially" maintain it. We cannot > allow just any thorn in. Of course, this isn't anything against > TensorTypes - just a general statement. > I have added TensorTypes to the CactusNumerical arrangement and switched its license to LGPL.
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
