On 12 May 2016, at 21:37, Frank Loeffler <kn...@cct.lsu.edu> wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:00:40PM +0200, Eloisa Bentivegna wrote: >> this is really due to the fact that this specific variable >> (ct_multilevel-err) should not be tested for relative changes, as it's >> difficult to define a natural tolerance, and sometimes even the smallest >> differences in execution lead to very large relative changes. I have >> just pushed a commit that makes sure that a failure is only triggered if >> the absolute difference is above threshold. > > That is great, thanks. > > On the other hand, the actual change that most likely triggered this > was a change in option lists on Jenkins, and there most likely the > -Ofast option. Before build #758 [1], the Jenkins VM used a special > jenkins option list, and starting with that build, it now uses the > generic Ubuntu option list. > > Now, the tests should obviously also pass using that option list, but I > found it interesting to know why it started to fail when it did. Was the > change in option list intentional?
Hi Frank, No, this was not intentional. The change in question (https://bitbucket.org/ianhinder/cactusjenkins/commits/d7021a52bd83448db589b2346c43441682eecabb) was not supposed to change the optionlist used for the main ET job, but now that I look at it, I see that it had exactly that effect. I think when I first made the change, I was working on a separate copy of the repository that wouldn't affect the main job, but when I committed it a few days later, I forgot that I needed to add an exclusion if it was in the main job. I could add such an exclusion, but since it seems to work now and it is better to test the main ubuntu optionlist, I think I will just leave it as-is. Do you agree? This will also have the effect of making the builds slower, as the standard ubuntu optionlist does not use ccache. -- Ian Hinder http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users