On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Barry Wardell <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Ian Hinder <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 30 May 2016, at 14:33, Roland Haas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I guess this would be one of the few times where a change in HDF5
>> breaks binary compatibility between different minor HDF5 versions.
>>
>> I believe there is some code that casts a hid_t (or some other hdf5
>> type) to a CCTK_INT (that I wrote) though I also think that that code
>> contains an assert that the actual value is small enough to fit into a
>> CCTK_INT.
>>
>>
>> One option would be to use the hdf5-18 package in MacPorts for this
>> release, assuming that this fixes the problem.
>>
>
> For me, using Homebrew on OS X all tests pass apart from
> CT_MultiLevel.boostedpuncture/2procs. Homebrew currently provides HDF5
> 1.8.16, so it sounds likely that HDF5 1.8.10 is to blame for your test
> failures other than the CT_MultiLevel one.
>

I corrected a HDF5 1.10-related bug in PUGH. Is there another issue?

-erik

-- 
Erik Schnetter <[email protected]>
http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/personal/eschnetter/
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to