On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 01:51:40PM +0200, Gwyneth Allwright wrote:
Apparently one needs the development version of Lapack for a successful Lorene compilation (http://www.lorene.obspm.fr/prerequisites.html), but I think I only have the December 2016 release. I'll see if adding the development version makes a difference.
Hi,A note on terminology here: what Lorene means with "development version" is the package that includes the header files, not a version still in development. If you were to install Lapack by hand you usually get both, but distributions often split them because the majority of users only ever needs the library itself. You only need the header files if you compile against the library, not if you only run something that uses it.
Thus, a release from last year is perfectly fine. Depending on what distribution you use, "development" packages (meant for development using them) are sometimes called package-dev or package-devel.
Frank
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
