Agreed, but the available machines in Xsede change every 3 years or so. It would be nice if we had a way to update/add to such "live" paper with a supplementary repo(?)
Carlos Lousto > On May 10, 2017, at 10:29 AM, Ian Hinder <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On 10 May 2017, at 15:31, helvi witek <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> we are going to apply for HPC time using the Lean code which is largely >> based on the Einstein Toolkit. Among the required technical information are >> scaling tests. While we will perform our own tests I also checked for >> "official" information for the ET. I noticed that there is very little >> public information, e.g. on the wiki, about recent (say, within the last >> five years) scaling tests aside from Eloisa's recent paper >> http://inspirehep.net/record/1492289 >> and this tracker >> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/pipermail/users/2013-February/002815.html >> >> Did I miss anything? It might be a good idea to add a standardized test or >> references to the wiki page. > > It would probably be very useful for many groups if we were to write a short > paper describing the scaling of the ET in various cases on current HPC > machines. For someone running simulations very similar to those used, > referring to such a paper may be sufficient to demonstrate scaling of the > code for a proposal. If the code used was quite different, then if the > parameter files and any required scripts from such a paper were made public, > it would be easier for each group to adapt them to their own code. > > -- > Ian Hinder > http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
