Hi Ian,
Bela found a bug in the null code and I committed his fix on June 2.
That commit included an updated testsuite for SphericalHarmonicRecon,
but not for SphericalHarmonicReconGen. I wonder if the
SphericalHarmonicReconGen testsuite is out of date.
The failure for SphericalHarmonicRecon is quite weird.
The failing code is
if (minval(abs(zeta - dcmplx(1,1))) < 1.0d-10) then
Tarr = minloc(abs(stereo_q(:,1)-1.))
loc_q = Tarr(1)
Tarr = minloc(abs(stereo_p(1,:)-1.))
loc_p = Tarr(1)
if (abs(zeta(loc_q,loc_p) - dcmplx(1.,1.)) .gt. 1d-10) then
call CCTK_WARN(0, " Error ")
endif
endif
I can't figure out why the test is there. However, I also can't figure
out how it can fail.
Basically the code uses either two real angular coordinates (q and p)
or one complex one (zeta). With zeta = q + i * p. The code is checking
that if zeta == 1+i anywhere, that it is equal to 1 + i at the point
where q=1 and p=1.
Can you try to output
loc_q, loc_p, stereo_p(1,loc_p), stereo_p(loc_q,1), and zeta(loc_q, loq_p)?
On 07/13/2017 04:31 AM, Ian Hinder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are down to three failing tests in Jenkins:
>
> SphericalHarmonicRecon.regression_test/2procs
> SphericalHarmonicReconGen.SpEC-dat-test/2procs
> SphericalHarmonicReconGen.SpEC-h5-test/2procs
>
> These tests all pass on one process but fail on two processes in
> Jenkins, which uses the ubuntu.cfg optionlist. They all seem to pass on
> multiple processes on all other machines
> (http://einsteintoolkit.org/testsuite_results/index.php), including my
> laptop with gcc.
>
> The first, SphericalHarmonicRecon.regression_test, fails like this:
>
> WARNING level 0 from host 7ce14e5707a0 process 0
> while executing schedule bin NullEvol_Initial, routine
> NullEvolve::NullEvol_InitialSlice
> in thorn NullEvolve, file NullEvol_InitialSlice.F90:42:
> -> Error
>
> The second, SphericalHarmonicReconGen.SpEC-dat-test, fails like this:
>
> NewsB_scri.L02Mm01.asc: substantial differences
> significant differences on 1 (out of 2) lines
> maximum absolute difference in column 1 is 963
> maximum absolute difference in column 2 is 0.000185770963653907
> maximum absolute difference in column 3 is 0.000142466608463344
> maximum relative difference in column 1 is 1
> maximum relative difference in column 2 is 1
> maximum relative difference in column 3 is 1
> ...
>
> The third, SphericalHarmonicReconGen.SpEC-h5-test, fails like this:
>
> NewsB_scri.L02Mm01.asc: substantial differences
> significant differences on 1 (out of 2) lines
> maximum absolute difference in column 1 is 963
> maximum absolute difference in column 2 is 0.000185770963653907
> maximum absolute difference in column 3 is 0.000142466608463344
> maximum relative difference in column 1 is 1
> maximum relative difference in column 2 is 1
> maximum relative difference in column 3 is 1
> ...
>
> I suspect the second and third failures have the same cause. Do we have
> any idea why these tests fail? They don't seem to fail on any other
> machines (http://einsteintoolkit.org/testsuite_results/index.php).
>
> --
> Ian Hinder
> http://members.aei.mpg.de/ianhin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@einsteintoolkit.org
> http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@einsteintoolkit.org
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
