Thank you Roland for your reply!

In the meanwhile I was  able to solve the issue. I changed my original evolution requation

ζ̈=Aζ′+Bζ″+Cζ\ddot{\zeta} = A \zeta' + B \zeta'' +C \zeta into a system (1) of

ζ˙=Π\dot{\zeta} = \PiΠ˙=Aζ′+Bζ″+Cζ\dot{\Pi}=A\zeta'+B\zeta''+C\zet I wanted to avoid the second-order numerical derivatives by using a system (2)

ζ˙=Π\dot{\zeta}=\PiΠ˙=AH+BH′+Cζ\dot{\Pi}=AH+BH'+C\zetaH˙=Π′\dot{H}=\Pi'which was source of the problem. This system is analytically equivalent to the one above, but indeed not strongly hyperbolic.

I also had to change the boundaries near the r=0 region of the grid, but the main issue was the aforementioned one. System (1) works with the new boundary conditions.

Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Severin
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to