Dear Roland, Sir, the outdated variables and refinement levels are related? I am bit confused because same warnings are there for 8 refinement levels. Precisely, I wanna ask is there any alternative to using old version for encountering out-dated variables.
Regards, Bilal Hameed. On Thu, Jan 14, 2021, 1:04 AM Roland Haas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Karima, > > I don't think you can reduce the number of refinement levels by quite > that much. You need to have at least ~24 points across the radius of > the black hole which is about the size of its mass. > > So for a black hole of unit mass 1. you will need to have a resolution > of 1./24. on the finest grid and each finer grid has twice the > resolution of the coarsest grid. > > I don't know what GetComponent failures you were getting but the old > thornlist refers to old svn servers that use outdated SSL libraries and > newer operating systems will refuse to talk to them. > > You may be able to download the code using an virtual machine (or > docker image) using Ubuntu 16.04 which still talks to those old SSL > libraries. > > Yours, > Roland > > > Hello, > > > > There is a spinning single BH evolution example inside (Cactus > Cactus/par/arXiv-1111.3344/kerr/by-a0.7.par) which is using the code > version 2010. I am trying to simulate it using the newest version of the > ETK with the only changes of refinement levels (reduced to 3) in the > parameter file. It is giving some warnings and suggestions to change the > out-dated parameters ( LapseAdvectionCoeff, ShiftAdvectionCoeff) along with > the boundary condition to set as usual (what it means?). I also tried using > the suggested parameters, but the data output is not as expected > (incomplete output data), probably because of these out-dated parameters > (?), the output and the error files are attached. I am asking if there are > any alternatives (solutions) to these parameters, or should I prefer using > the old ETK version, 2010? In the latter case, I am again encountering the > download error, pasted below. Likewise, I want to get around this issue as > well. I assume this email contains multi issues, but they are co-related, > sorry to put them in one post. > > > > > > ./GetComponents --parallel > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th__;!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORYP9QSta$ > < > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://einsteintoolkit.th/__;!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORV5BJMIo$ > > > > Note: I have tried without using the "--parallel option" as well, but > the same error persists. > > > > Error: No definition for ET_RELEASE found in input file or ENV. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > CalledProcessError Traceback (most recent call > last) > > <ipython-input-26-9fa64924ebf0> in <module> > > ----> 1 get_ipython().run_cell_magic('bash', '', './GetComponents > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th*5Cn__;JQ!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORQtZW0Ik$ > '< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th/n__;!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORYyh5V47$ > '>) > > > > ~/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/IPython/core/interactiveshell.py in > run_cell_magic(self, magic_name, line, cell) > > 2369 with self.builtin_trap: > > 2370 args = (magic_arg_s, cell) > > -> 2371 result = fn(*args, **kwargs) > > 2372 return result > > 2373 > > > > ~/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/IPython/core/magics/script.py in > named_script_magic(line, cell) > > 140 else: > > 141 line = script > > --> 142 return self.shebang(line, cell) > > 143 > > 144 # write a basic docstring: > > > > <decorator-gen-110> in shebang(self, line, cell) > > > > ~/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/IPython/core/magic.py in > <lambda>(f, *a, **k) > > 185 # but it's overkill for just that one bit of state. > > 186 def magic_deco(arg): > > --> 187 call = lambda f, *a, **k: f(*a, **k) > > 188 > > 189 if callable(arg): > > > > ~/.local/lib/python3.8/site-packages/IPython/core/magics/script.py in > shebang(self, line, cell) > > 243 sys.stderr.flush() > > 244 if args.raise_error and p.returncode!=0: > > --> 245 raise CalledProcessError(p.returncode, cell, > output=out, stderr=err) > > 246 > > 247 def _run_script(self, p, cell, to_close): > > > > CalledProcessError: Command 'b'./GetComponents > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th*5Cn__;JQ!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORQtZW0Ik$ > ''< > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bitbucket.org/einsteintoolkit/manifest/raw/ET_2010_06/einsteintoolkit.th/n__;!!DZ3fjg!sigvfgWGeQ0X7lHGuA-OW7uY9jnasKCJLBs5QhHGxlxe3jCIb5Ubj1iORYyh5V47$ > ''> returned non-zero exit status 25. > > > > > > > > Any kind of assistance would highly be appreciated and worthwhile. > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > Best, > > > > Karima S > > > > > -- > My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting > and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://pgp.mit.edu . > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
