Thanks, Roland, for looking at this! Very good point, that seems likely to be the culprit. I’ll give that a go and hopefully it’ll solve the issue.
Best, Deborah -------------------------------------- Deborah Ferguson Post Doc University of Texas at Austin From: Roland Haas <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 9:07 AM To: Ferguson, Deborah <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Users] The following grid structure consistency check failed: Synchronisation and boundary prolongation Hello Deborah, looking at your parfile you are regridding every 288 but the coarsest level steps at every 64 and with the 2 freezing options you will have the regrid only happen at the smallest common multiple which would be 9*288. You may want to try setting this to 256 instead. Yours, Roland > I submitted a simulation on Stampede that ran for several days (1024.4 M) > before failing with multiple errors of the form: > > > [ml=0 rl=10 c=13] The following grid structure consistency check failed: > > Synchronisation and boundary prolongation: All points must have been > received > > needrecv.empty() > > > Does anyone know why this may have happened after running for so long? I’ve > attached for the most recent output, the .err file, the .out file, the > parameter file, grid.asc, and the ShiftTracker files. Let me know if anything > else would be useful. > > Thanks for any thoughts you might have! > > Best, > Deborah > > -------------------------------------- > Deborah Ferguson > Post Doc > University of Texas at Austin -- My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://pgp.mit.edu .
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
