Hello all, Bruno, Before this takes on a live of its own:
I re-did my own tests and found no more differences after a single Euler step. The issue that caused me to think there were differences before were: * I had looked at the wrong column in norms output and mistaken an "average" norm for a "maximum" norm (and the average will change due to different orders of values being summed up) * I still think I see a difference in values for points that are at the same location on different refinement levels (which should also not be in a vertex centered run), but those seem the same no matter whether I use 4 or 8 MPI ranks (also a bug if true, but of different kind) > Regarding the BNS issues, is it something due to when you recover from > checkpoint? Maybe, I don't know. > In Whisky we had an issue related to that due to Con2Prim running after > recovery from checkpoint. Yes, I had pointed it out in the past to Michal. For those one can set: MoL::run_MoL_PostStep_in_Post_Recover_Variables = "no" which as Bruno said, disables the extra con2prim after checkpoint recovery. Yours, Roland -- My email is as private as my paper mail. I therefore support encrypting and signing email messages. Get my PGP key from http://pgp.mit.edu .
pgpu_xfN2dY6D.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@einsteintoolkit.org http://lists.einsteintoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/users
