2008/9/19 Arjun Panday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > (a) would be a good idea anyway, because it would make it possible to use >> other null objects than the default ones the dep. mgr. provides. For >> example, in some cases i would like to have a "null" object for a LogService >> that prints to system out. Other examples are proxies that throw exceptions >> on any invoked method, etc. >> > > > As for iPojo (I know I won't be making new friends with this..), although > i've tried to use it, i haven't quite understood its true benefits: > - the xml syntax has the usual drawbacks (no compilation error: so we spend > ages debugging typos) >
It's a well-known issue, that I'm trying to tackle in the next release. First, we provide XML-Schemas ( http://felix.apache.org/site/using-xml-schemas.html) checking your metadata consistency during the packaging time. We plan to provide a static checking soon too (at least for core features). Clement
