Clement Escoffier a écrit :
Hi,
On 03.02.2009, at 16:40, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
2009/2/3 Rob Walker <[email protected]>
The servicebinder model has served us very well and still does. I note
though that there are perhaps newer approaches such as Declarative
Services
and iPojo. Very interested in views on:
* benefits of moving from servicebinder (especially any real
experiences from others who have done this)
* pros and cons of either DS or iPojo as the model to move to
interesting, Karl and I were just chatting about this...
iPOJO provides a really comprehensive component model, where you
can add almost any sort of behaviour using handlers - the downside in
my opinion is that it requires you to instrument your bundles in the
build
phase - these bundles cannot then be used without iPOJO
The instrumentation is made in a way that you don't need iPOJO to use
a manipulated class (see
http://felix.apache.org/site/dive-into-the-ipojo-manipulation-depths.html).
The only downside, is that the iPOJO management will not happen.
Just to be 100% clear, does this means that your instrumented class can
be reused outside of OSGi ?
I mean,will the following pseudo code work outside of OSGi, with the
manipulated classes ?
MyComponent mc = new MyComponent();
mc.setProperty("hello");
mc.doSomething();
Thanks
--Guillaume
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
