On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/2/17 Sahoo <[email protected]> > >> Currently the default value of <Private-Package> is empty. Should it by >> default not include all the classes of the current project? >> > > hehe, see http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-912 > > The latest 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT now sets the default Export-Package / > Private-Package based on the actual project source (if you set _either_ > Export-Package or Private-Package then these defaults are not used). > > The distribution of packages is as follows: all packages with source files > (ie. *.java) in the current project are exported, except for packages with > "impl" or "internal" or the default package (".") which are kept as private. > > The one remaining question is what to do if only Export-Package is set... we > could set Private-Package based on the actual project source which would > guarantee all your local classes will be in the bundle, but what if you > don't actually want these packages included... > > Any thoughts on this last point?
This default behavior seems just fine to me. Maybe just give a warning that the default behavior is used as Export-Package is set but Private-Package is not. > > Thanks, >> Sahoo >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > > -- > Cheers, Stuart > -- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. http://www.codedragons.com - New Energy for Projects - Great People working on Great Projects at Great Places Sent from: Amsterdam Nh Netherlands. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
