I have created a JIRA issue and attached a small patch that fixes the problem.

cheers, Martin


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Stuart McCulloch [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2009 10:47
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: Bundle restarted when startlevel is changed to same level ->
> bug ?
> 
> 2009/2/18 Cornelius, Martin (DWBI) <[email protected]>
> 
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > i just observed a behaviour in felix-1.4.1 that looks like a
> contradiction
> > to the OSGi spec to me:
> >
> > I have a bundle installed, that has set it's bundlelevel to 2, and
> always
> > throws an execption in the BundleActivator.start() method.
> >
> > If i am in startlevel 1, and issue the shell-command 'startlevel 2', the
> > framework tries to start the bundle and logs an ERROR, as expected.
> >
> > However, if i now (being already in startlevel 2) repeat the command
> >  'startlevel 2', the framework again tries to start the bundle and
> > repeatedly logs an ERROR. IMHO, this looks like a contradiction to the
> spec,
> > which states in §8.2.2 :
> > If the requested start level is the active start level, the Framework
> will
> > not start or stop any bundles.
> >
> 
> yes, this looks like a bug - could you raise an issue on JIRA (along with
> a
> patch if you like ;)
> 
> 
> > Thanks in advance for any comments,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> >
> >
> > ************************************************
> > The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain
> > confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the
> > individual or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to
> legal
> > privilege.  If you have received this e-mail in error you should notify
> the
> > sender immediately by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system
> and
> > notify your system manager.  Please do not copy it for any purpose, or
> > disclose its contents to any other person.  The views or opinions
> presented
> > in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> > represent those of the company.  The recipient should check this e-mail
> and
> > any attachments for the presence of viruses.  The company accepts no
> > liability for any damage caused, directly or indirectly, by any virus
> > transmitted in this email.
> > ************************************************
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
> 
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________

 
************************************************
The information contained in, or attached to, this e-mail, may contain 
confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the individual 
or entity to whom they are addressed and may be subject to legal privilege.  If 
you have received this e-mail in error you should notify the sender immediately 
by reply e-mail, delete the message from your system and notify your system 
manager.  Please do not copy it for any purpose, or disclose its contents to 
any other person.  The views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely 
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.  The 
recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of 
viruses.  The company accepts no liability for any damage caused, directly or 
indirectly, by any virus transmitted in this email.
************************************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to