Thank you Karl,
I appreciate it.
Regards,
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Pauls [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 10:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OSGi and URL.openConnection
we might have an issue with proxies. I will look into it.
regards,
Karl
Am 26.02.2009 um 23:56 schrieb [email protected]:
> Richard,
> There is nothing specific in what I am doing. The protocol is HTTP.
> The
> only thing is that I use proxy i.e. call looks like url.openConnection
> (proxy). The exception comes from
> java.net.URLStreamHandler.openConnection(URLStreamHandler.java:80)
> and I
> use Sun JVM. Normally handler for open connection comes from
> sun.net.www.protocol so either urlhandler bundle redefines system
> property java.protocol.handler.pkgs or it sets its own
> URLStreamHandlerFactory. I didn't look into source code yet and by the
> way can I?
> Please let me know what additional information do you want me to
> provide.
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard S. Hall [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2009 6:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: OSGi and URL.openConnection
>
> We probably need more details about what is exactly going on, but you
> are right, it shouldn't be necessary to disable it.
>
> What does the URL look like for which you are doing
> url.openConnection()
> ?
>
> Are you defining your own stream handler for a custom protocol?
>
> -> richard
>
> [email protected] wrote:
>> I am total novice with OSGi and this is my first experiment. I turned
> my
>> application into set of bundles and it was successful except for one
>> issue. I have piece of code where I do something like that
>> url.openConnection (proxy); and here I've got
>> UnsupportedOperationException. Apparently something is getting messed
> up
>> in between OSGi and java.protocol.handler.pkgs system property. I
>> made
>> several unsuccessful attempts to fix it but eventually only way I
>> managed to make it work is by setting "felix.service.urlhandlers" to
>> "false". I think this is a wrong way to do it. What would be the
>> right
>> way and also what functionality did I loose by setting this property
> to
>> "false"
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
