"Richard S. Hall" <[email protected]> escribió el 16/07/2009 15:07:53:
> I believe OBR should favor already deployed providers over ones that > have not been deployed. Since framework 1.4.0 should already be > available from Felix' system bundle, it doesn't seem like this should > happen. Are you sure this is the dependency causing Equinox to be pulled in? It seems to be what is happening. > > You could probably test this by creating an empty bundle with only a > dependency on framework 1.4.0. If it is an issue, create a JIRA issue > attach the example and we will look into it. I will provide the test case on the JIRA issue with the example (bundles and repository.xml file) > > -> richard > > On 7/16/09 5:23 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > we are experiencing the following situation when using the bundle > > repository 1.4.0 over felix framework 1.8.0. > > > > The scenario is the following: > > > > 1) In the remote repository has been published one bundle ( > > org.eclipse.osgi/3.4.0.v20080605-1900 -- Equinox) that provide the > > capability (org.osgi.framework; version 1.4.0) > > 2) When you try to install a bundle X from the bundles repository that has > > got a<require> clause to org.osgi.framework; version 1.4.0. The dependency > > tree is being resolve including a dependency to the Equinox bundle that > > provides the required capability > > 3) During the deployment phase, the Equinox bundle is being installed in > > the Felix framework and a conflict appears due to the that the System > > Bundle (Felix framework) exports the same package with the same version > > > > In my opinion, I think that a wrong behaviuor is appearing due to the fact > > that the bundle repository is not checking if the org.osgi.framework; > > version 1.4.0 is exposed and is taking the information from the > > repository.xml file in order to solve the bundles dependency tree. > > > > Have you checked this behaviour with the bundle repository? Is this > > experienced behaviour correct according to the dependencies resolution > > algorithm implemented by the bundle repository? > > > > Regards, > > Miguel A. > > > > ***********Internet Email Confidentiality Footer************* > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > > solely for the use of the organization or individual to whom they are > > addressed. It is expressly forbidden to retransmit or copy email and/or > > this attached files without our permission . If you are not the > > addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the > > message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message > > to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly > > notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you or > > your employer does not consent to Internet email for messages of this > > kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that > > do not relate to the official business of my firm shall be understood as > > neither given nor endorsed by it. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
