Ok great that was my feeling too.

I've raised FELIX-1678 to track this, think it makes sense to do this
before a 1.0 release else we end up with potential migration problems
in the medium term.

Regards,

Dave

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
> I think going with the same format is the right choice, despite the
> differences you mention below.
>
> -> richard
>
> On 9/30/09 22:18, David Savage wrote:
>>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I'm getting closer to a 1.0 of sigil but before one is published I
>> think it would be sensible to look at one of the big things that has
>> popped up a number of times in conversation with third parties about
>> sigil. That being the use of yet another file format. One option which
>> seems quite attractive is to reuse the BND properties file format. I
>> thought I'd post a mail here to see if others have any opinions on
>> this...
>>
>> Note this would not imply an automatic conversion from BND to sigil as
>> BND is a post compile tool where as Sigil is a pre compile tool - as
>> such one large differentiator is the need to specify Import-Package
>> statements - in BND the tooling figures out the appropriate
>> Import-Package headers based on the bundles available in the classpath
>> - so setting up the Import-Package header is generally not required.
>> In sigil we use the Import-Package and Require-Bundle statement to
>> setup the classpath so manual set up the classpath is not generally
>> required.
>>
>> The other potential gotcha is around support for multi bundle projects
>> - I've heard that BND now supports this feature, but I've not seen any
>> examples of this in the wild. But certainly I'm interested in other
>> peoples experiences/opinions on this.
>>
>> Overall I think this would be a useful simplification for users as
>> they then only need to learn one properties file format. Any
>> downsides?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@felix.apache.org

Reply via email to