Thanks Stuart

I am still a bit new to OSGI, I dont get much time to play around with it,
so I hope the complexities of classloading in an OSGI environment does not
overwhelm me, nevertheless the article seems quite well written, I will have
a more in depth look into it

Thanks again

Ivanhoe


On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote:

> 2010/1/4 Ivanhoe Abrahams <[email protected]>
>
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have been playing around with Drools 5.0.1 running as a service in
> > Felix/Karaf.
> > I finally got it working using a very simple HelloWorld drools example
> (BTW
> > this is also my first stab at using Drools, so I'm no expert on that
> > framework).
> >
> > What I ended up with was.
> > 1. A bundle that starts/initializes the Drools service and exposes a
> method
> > which allows clients to call the Rules engine service.
> > 2. A domain Model bundle
> > 3. A fragment bundle which imports the exported packages from the domain
> > model bundle, as well as supplying the .drl file (which is the rules
> > engines' rule base)
> > 4. A client bundle which imports the exported packages from the model
> > bundle.
> >
> > The client then creates a model object, and calls the Drools service
> bundle
> > to execute the simple test.
> > The Service bundle is also the fragment-host for the fragment bundle. So
> in
> > that way it knows about the domain model, without explicitly declaring a
> > dependency on it.
> >
> > So my question is. Does the above seem right?
> > I have seen a couple of posts where the use of fragments are discouraged.
> > But I am not sure how to cleanly achieve  the above scenario without
> > fragments.
> >
> > Also what bugs me about my solution above is that, since the Drools rules
> > engine does some bytecode enhancement. I eventually had to add import
> > package statements to the bundle which contains the domain model. This
> just
> > seems wrong because my Service bundle already imports packages from the
> > underlying rules engine.
> >
>
> FYI, this article discusses bytecode enhancement in OSGi
>
>   http://www.infoq.com/articles/code-generation-with-osgi
>
> which might provide some hints or alternative solutions
>
> So basically the question is, are there better ways to achieve above
> > modularization.
> > How does one write a service, which needs to operate on some domain
> model,
> > but without knowing what those domain models will be beforehand.
> >
> > Thankyou in advance
> > Ivanhoe
> >
>
> --
> Cheers, Stuart
>

Reply via email to